Women and Politics

Geographical Perspective on Women in Local Government in Ireland

 

CLAIRE McGING

(Government of Ireland IRCHSS scholar, NUI Maynooth; claire.mcging@nuim.ie)

 

FEMINIST OPEN FORUM Panel Discussion  20 October 2011

 

This short paper aims to give a brief overview of women in local government inIrelandfrom a geographical perspective. While a large body of work has explored Irish women (or rather the lack of them) in national politics, little research has focussed on the local level. However, local politics remains the most common route to Dáil Eireann and it is often at this level that aspiring TDs build up the experience, networks and recognition required to successfully contest a general election. Recent research by Buckley, Mariani, McGing and White (2011) on candidates in the 2011 general election shows that 45% of those that had previously held a seat at local level were successful in winning a Dáil seat, as opposed to just 11% that had not.

Women are markedly underrepresented in Irish politics in comparison to their presence in the population, accounting for just 15% of TDs, 30% of senators, 25% of MEPs, 16% of county and city councillors, and 22% of urban district council councillors. While females have a higher presence in local government compared to the national parliament in other democracies (Phillips, 1993), these figures show that this has not been the case inIreland, where progress in local politics has been very similar to (and as slow as) the Dáil.

 

Where are all the women?

The academic literature advises five main challenges preventing women from making a breakthrough in local and national politics: care, cash, culture, confidence and candidate selection. The ‘5 C’s’ interact throughout the process recruitment process. The persistent sexual division of care (for children and elderly parents) means that women lack the time required to nurture a local political base. A report from the Central Statistics Office (2011) shows that half a million women are engaged full-time in activities in the home, compared to just 7,500. With not a much earning potential as men and less cash at their disposal, women find it harder to build up the funds for a political campaign. Politics, inIreland and elsewhere, is a ‘gendered institution’. Norms, behaviour and values were established at a time when women were still campaigning for voting rights. This means that culture of political parties is intrinsically masculine, making it less attractive to women, while also acting to decrease their confidence levels. These factors come together at the most crucial barrier for females: the selection convention process. Research shows that women are severely underrepresented as convention candidates and are less successful in relative terms to men when they do seek a nomination (McGing, 2011).

Gender and geography in the 2009 local elections [i]

This section considers the importance of electoral geography in determining women’s political participation at a local level. Are females more likely to run in and/or represent certain constituencies or regions?

Table 1 below shows that 17.1% of all candidates for city and county councils in the 2009 local elections were women. This figure marginally bucks the trend set over the previous two decades of increasing levels of female participation in local electoral contests, wherein female participation rates had increased from 11.0% in 1985 to 14.0% in 1991, 15.6% in 1999 and 18.1% in 2004. Table 1 uncovers significant differences between the larger parties and the smaller, more ideological, parties in terms of their propensity to select female election candidates, although the smaller parties all failed to meet the gender quota targets that they had adopted for these elections. Labour and Sinn Féin had both proposed quotas of 30%, while the Greens were even more ambitious in their aspiration for an increase in female candidacies by pursuing a quota of 40% (Weeks, 2009: 101).

Party Total Male Female % Female
Fianna Fáil 473 393 80 16.9%
Fine Gael 470 385 85 18.1%
Labour 208 160 48 23.1%
Sinn Féin 149 115 34 22.8%
Green Party 77 60 17 22.1%
Others 446 398 48 10.8%
Total 1823 1511 312 17.1%

Table 1: Number of male and female candidates selected by political parties to contest the 2009 local elections

While the percentage of female candidates selected by Labour (4.1%) and Sinn Féin (2.7%) did improve on their 2004 levels, the proportion of Green Party female candidates actually declined, marking a decrease of 15.2% from its 2004 levels. Fianna Fáil has a target to have a third of all its candidates female in the 2014 local elections (Weeks, 2009: 101) and had announced prior to the candidate selection process that it would interview “young people and females in particular” around the country (Regan, 2009), but despite this it only registered a 2.4% increase on its relatively low 2004 female participation levels.

Significant spatial variations exist in terms of the likelihood of women being selected as candidates, mirroring the general trend observed in recent general and local elections, with the percentage of female candidacies considerably higher inDublinand its immediate commuter hinterland, as well as in some of the other city council areas.DublinCity(27.1%) had the highest number of female candidacies, followed by Dún Laoghaire (26.2%), Meath (24.2%), Kilkenny (23.5%), South Dublin (23.0%), Fingal (21.0%) andWaterfordCity(20.0%), although female participation levels inCorkCity(16.9%) andLimerickCity(12.8%) were lower than the national average. Especially high female participation levels were found in the Dublin Inner City electoral areas (45.7%), and indeed only two of the candidates selected by the three larger parties in the two South Inner City electoral areas were male. Women were considerably underrepresented as candidates in the more rural constituencies, with especially low female participation levels found in Tipperary South Riding and Clare (10.3%), Leitrim (10.8%), Mayo (11.8%), Monaghan (12.1%), Tipperary North Riding (12.2%), Longford (12.2%) andWaterfordCounty(12.5%). The regional analysis conveyed in Table 7 further confirms the urban bias in female candidate selection. Although parties speak out about rectifying the disproportionate nature of gender with regard to candidate tickets, a geographical analysis of female candidates in the 2009 local elections contends that there has been a failure on the part of party central organisations in doing so, especially in rural areas.

Region Female candidates (%) Success rate (%)
Dublin 24.8% 52.0%
DublinCommuter Belt 18.8% 40.8%
South-East 17.8% 38.3%
Border 15.2% 51.2%
Connacht andWest Munster 15.5% 45.5%
Midlands 14.0% 44.1%

Table 2: Number of female 2009 local election candidates selected by region, and their relative success levels

 

Nationally, the success rate of female candidates in these local elections stood at 46.8%, marking an increase on the 2004 local elections, when 42.5% of female candidates won seats. A review of other past local elections places the respective figures at 44.8% in 1999, 44.8% in 1991 and at 34.0% in 1985. Despite the sharp increase between 1985 and 1991, the amount of women winning council seats has remained relatively static since then. Notable differences existed between parties, with 65.9% of female Fine Gael and 62.4% of female Labour candidates proving successful, as against just 41.2% of female Fianna Fáil candidates and 35.3% of female Sinn Féin candidates. The Green Party failed to elect any women to county and city councils in 2009. In the Others category, 31.3% of female candidates won seats, with significant successes for female Socialist Party and People Before Profit alliance candidates in Dublin City and Fingal. In geographical terms, an urban bias is again evident, with females shown to be more likely to win seats in Dublin than in any of the other regions (Table 2), although it also shows that female candidates fared better electorally in the Border, West and Midlands regions than they did in the more urban Dublin Commuter Belt and South East regions.

 

Figure 1: Percentage of votes cast for female candidates at a county level in the 2009 local elections

Further proof that urban areas proved to be healthier stomping for female candidates is offered by Figure 1, which shows that the percentage of votes cast for female candidates tended to be higher inDublinand its immediate hinterland than in the more rural regions, although relatively high levels were also found in the counties of Cavan,Sligoand Kilkenny. 28.0% of all votes cast inDublinCitywere won by female candidates, while female candidates also won high votes shares relative to the national average (17.0%) in Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown (26.8%), Fingal (25.0%), Meath (23.9%) andSouth Dublin(23.7%). Even though high by national standards, these figures must be viewed as disappointing given that females account for a half of the state’s population. These do, of course, compare favourably with levels for Clare, Westmeath, Monaghan and Louth where less than one-tenth of all votes cast were won by female candidates. Support levels for female candidates were highest in the Dublin Inner City electoral areas, where females won 54.0% of the valid poll in the electoral areas, and especially in the South West Inner City electoral area where female candidates won 72.1% of the vote. Female candidates succeeded in winning over half of the votes cast in only one other electoral area – Castleknock (51.2%) – although strong support levels for females were also observed in the North Inner City (49.1%), Rathfarnham (47.3%), Castleconnell (45.4%) and North Inner City (44.5%) electoral areas. Contrasting with this, there was no female candidates to contest twenty seven of the electoral areas.

Some interesting patterns emerge when candidate success rates for city and county contests are broken down by gender (see Table 3 below). With just over 50% winning seats, male candidates for rural councils were the most successful. Interestingly, men running for in urban areas were the least successful, while females saw similar rates across the urban-rural divide.

% Successful City/urban councils County/rural councils
Male candidates 42.5% 50.8%
Female candidates 46.6% 47.2%

Table 3: Successful candidates by gender and council type in the 2009 local elections

 

Debates for feminising Irish local politics

In May 2011, Phil Hogan, Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government, announced his intention to introduce legislation whereby political parties must ensure that 30% of their general election candidates are female. The proposed sanction for non-compliance is very strict: parties face losing 50% of their state annual funding they do not meet the quota requirement. The proposed legislation is due to come into affect at the next general election. Although it has been welcomed by groups and individuals advocating greater gender equality in political decision-making, a number have argued that the quota should also be applied for elections to other levels of political office, especially for local elections. The minister has so far ruled this out due to the fact that party state funding is based on the share of the vote a given party receives in the previous general election. However, Phil Hogan has stated that he hopes all parties will replicate the model on a voluntary basis in the 2014 local elections. This paper has argued that the scarcity of women councillors prevents the development of a ‘pipeline’ of potential female candidates for the Dáil, thus making a strong case for the use of positive discrimination measures to be extended to the local level, especially in rural areas.

Why is it important to have a gender balance in local and national office? The main arguments in the academic literature for increasing women’s political representation can be broken down into three distinct themes: justice, difference and symbolism (Buckley and McGing 2011).

Justice arguments for increasing women’s political presence are the most powerful. In essence, justice advocates contend that it is simply unfair for men to disproportionately populate political assemblies (Phillips 1995). This perspective does not presume that women will make any difference to the political process, but argues that gendered barriers must be dismantled in the name of equal opportunity to ensure that political representatives are more descriptive of Irish society as a whole.

Difference arguments for increasing women’s political representation are more contentious. Looking at theory and empirical evidence, gender is seen as relevant to the ways in which elected representatives perform their role. In this line of reasoning gender is a structure that imposes a particular position on women and makes all women different from men. For some women bring different perspectives and priorities to all policy areas because of different life experiences, while others argue that there are distinct women’s issues or interests that merit political representation and an adequate number of women representatives is often required to bring these into the discourses of representational politics (Lovenduski 2005). Given the current economic situation, a gender balance in decision-making may be more important then ever. Local women’s groups have tirelessly highlighted the gendered nature of the Irish recession, showing that women suffer disproportionately from reductions in the minimum wage and social welfare payments, as well as from cuts to public services and public sector employment (National Women’s Council of Ireland 2011). Considering this, the inclusion of women voices in the discourses of economic recovery and state rejuvenation at a local and national level is absolutely vital. This paper has illustrated that rural women and their distinct interests are especially underrepresented in politics and it crucial that more are encouraged to enter political life to ensure that their voices are heard.

Some scholars have argued that the presence of women representatives is important for symbolic reasons because they may act as role models for women. Although women often appear to be slightly less interested in politics, some international studies have suggested that the presence of visible female candidates and elected representatives helps to mobilise women, stimulate their interest and activity in the election campaign, and increase their own confidence in making the decision to run themselves (Karp and Banducci 2008).

References

 

Fiona Buckley, Mack Mariani, Claire McGing and Tim White (2011) Pipeline Theory and Women’s Recruitment to the Irish Parliament., Annual Conference of the Political Studies Association of Ireland, University College Dublin , 21-23 October 2011.

Buckley, Fiona. and McGing, Claire. (2011) ‘Women and the Election’ In: Michael Gallagher and Michael Marsh (eds). How Ireland Voted 2011.London: Palgrave MacMillan

 

Karp, Jeffrey, and Susan Banducci. (2008) When Politics is Not Just a Man’s Game: Women’s Representation and Political Engagement, Electoral Studies 27(1): 105-115.

Lovenduski, Joni. (2005) Feminizing Politics.Cambridge:  Polity Press.

McGing, Claire. (2011) “Still a Man’s World? The Gender Question in the 2011 General Election in the Republicof Ireland,” Paper Presented at the Elections, Public Opinion and Parties Conference,University ofExeter, 9-11 September 2011.

National Women’s Council of Ireland(2011) Submission to Budget 2012 – http://www.nwci.ie/publications/fulllist/prebudget-submission-2012/ (accessed 16 October 2011).

 

 

 


[i] Much of this data was collected by Dr. Adrian Kavanagh at the Department of Geography,NUI Maynooth.

____________________________________________________________________________________________

 ‘Why STILL so few? Women and Irish Politics’

ALISON SPILLANE

Speaking Notes

FEMINIST OPEN FORUM Panel Discussion,  20th October 2011

 

Timeliness of the discussion: If we look at recent developments there are some positives in that, following the UPR of our human rights record by the UN, Ireland has just accepted recommendations to take additional measures to eliminate inequalities between women and men and, specifically, to implement further measures to eliminate the under-representation of women in decision-making roles, particularly in the political arena – there has been clear acceptance by government that this is an issue which needs to be addressed.

  1. 1.       Gender Quotas

On both sides of the fence in that I support gender quotas but do not support them as proposed by the current government as it is purely tokenistic in its present form. Just as Enda Kenny appointing more women than men to the Seanad is tokenistic when it is regarded by his own party as a dying institution.

At the general election held in February 2011, 86 of the 566 candidates who sought election were women, representing 15.19% of the total. Of the 166 members of Dáil Éireann returned after the election, 25 were women, representing 15.06% of the total.

Back in June Phil Hogan published the General Scheme of the Electoral (Amendment) (Political Funding) Bill which looks at a range of issues around party funding – specifically it will mean that a qualified political party will have to have at least 30% female candidates and at least 30% male candidates at the next general election in order to receive full State funding. A party which doesn’t meet these targets will have its funding reduced by 50%, and the 30% quota will rise to 40% after seven years.

Not radical enough – why not a 40% target…why not 50%? The aim of a measure like this is to counter-act nearly a century of under-representation – by my own (very rough) calculations women have held just 244 of 4,618 Dáil seats since 1919. The problem is systemic, and this is what the Fine Gael/Labour proposals fail to address.

  1. 2.       Local Government

Firstly, at the most basic level, these proposals won’t apply to local elections, the next round of which are due in 2014 – local government is an area in need of major reform, and addressing gender imbalance should be a key part of any reforms targeted at this area. Basically, the issue of female under-representation in parliament cannot be looked at in isolation – it is a systemic problem and we need a broad, wide-ranging approach to tackle systemic inequalities if we want to make a genuine and lasting difference. For example, according to a 2009 report by an Oireachtas sub-committee on women’s participation in politics, “Following the 2009 local elections, the position has actually worsened [since 2004], with women constituting only 16% of councillors elected; and men representing 84% of councillors. Indeed, in those elections, two county councils, Clare and Wicklow, and Waterford City Council returned just one woman each; out of 32 seats in Clare, 24 in Wicklow and 15 at Waterford City Council. On that note, it is interesting to look at the make-up of the management teams of our city and county councils and in particular the City/County Managers who hold a significant amount of power at local level. A quick glance at our five City Councils (Dublin, Cork, Galway, Limerick, & Waterford) shows that all five City Managers are male and of the Councils that list their management team on their website we also see a significant under-representation of women (Cork: of the 13 people listed in the management team, three were women; in Galway there is one woman on the five person management team; and in Limerick one out of seven positions on the management team is held by a women). By the same token, a cursory glance at our government departments again reveals a significant gender imbalance with only three female Secretaries General (Education & Skills, Social Protection, Environment, Community & Local Government) out of sixteen departments.

Extract from Oireachtas report:

“The National Women’s Council (NWCI) conducted a survey of women candidates in the 2009 local elections, finding that women had had very negative experiences, including bullying, intimidation and offensive comments from members of the public; and paternalistic attitudes within political parties. Over 80% of the candidates surveyed agreed that a critical mass of women is needed in politics to overcome these problems, and in launching the survey the NWCI recommended that legislation be adopted to compel political parties to put forward greater numbers of women candidates at the next general election.”

  1. 3.       Barriers to women in politics

October 2009 Joint Oireachtas Committee on Justice, Equality, Defence & Women’s Rights produced a report on women’s participation in politics which identified the barriers to women’s entrance into politics as childcare, cash, confidence, culture, and candidate selection procedures. These are well-known and, as some have noted, potentially damaging to women because they are so ingrained as the “problems”  but they can be a useful starting point for expanding the conversation beyond, for example, solely the care of children.

  1. Childcare (care work in general, and societal values)

In this regard the report observed, “Women are still presumed to bear the primary responsibility for childcare in Irish society, yet political systems traditionally have not been constructed to facilitate those with caring responsibilities”.

There have been some advances in this regard. For example, the launch in January 2010 of the Free Pre-School Year, known as the ECCE Scheme, was a very positive step. The Free Pre-School Year reduces costs to parents for a single year immediately before school entry, but it only provides up to 15 free hours per week, and it provides no financial assistance for the care and education of younger children (payment is made to institutions providing the pre-school place rather than families). Costs of early care and education for families inIrelandare among the highest in EU and OECD countries, because of the low level of public subsidy. The fact that there has been a 94% take up by parents of the Free Pre-School Year scheme is a clear illustration that parents recognise the value and importance of affordable and accessible care and education services for young children.

As a general rule then, we lack family-friendly policies which makes it very challenging for women to work within a system that is very demanding and lacks family-friendly hours.

This is part of a much larger debate about the way in which care work is valued by Irish society. For examply, the 2009 report by the Central Statistics Office ‘Women and Men inIreland’ showed that 99% of those whose main activity was managing the home and caring for family were women. If we look at our Constitution we see that men are defined out of care whereas as women are morally bound to be carers (Article 41.2). Data from the 2006 Census shows that more than 160,000 people work as unpaid carers of adult dependents – 62% of these are women. However, as Professor Kathleen Lynch as pointed out, the way in which the Census defines care means it excludes carers of children and those who are carers of adults and children.

Argument that priorities, or societal values, shifted during the boom, business – and wealth especially – were put on a pedestal and became the clear indicators of success at the expense of community development, investment in health (Harney – ‘Closer to Boston than Berlin’) and education, as well as a very black and white approach to crime whereby money was thrown at an inefficient prison system to deal with perceived ‘thugs’ and ‘scumbags’ instead of investing in the root causes of crime – namely poverty, drug and alcohol addiction, exposure to physical/mental/emotional abuse, and so on.

This shift in priorities which became more marked during the boom hasn’t left us (in my view, it’s part of the reason why someone like Seán Gallaghar is topping opinion polls). To illustrate this point we only have to look at our so-called paper of record, the Irish Times. A couple of weeks ago, the Community Platform launched ‘Paying Our Way – progressive proposals for reforming the tax system’, a comprehensive and well-researched document which, to my knowledge, received no coverage in the Irish Times. It certainly didn’t make the front page. In contrast, certain journalists could barely contain their excitement when the Great and Good of Irish society (in the form of 17 ‘leading businesspeople’, only one of which was a woman) published ‘A Blueprint for Ireland’s Recovery’ – the proposal was authored by such luminaries as Mike Soden, former chief excecutive of BOI, chairman of Goldman Sachs Peter Sutherland as well as the noted patriots Denis O’Brien and Dermot Desmond. The publication of their proposals received front-page coverage and the Irish Times embedded the document on its website along with a separate article outlining the Executive Summary for ease of access. We saw the same kind of thing last week with the publication of the Keane Report on Mortgage Arrears. The Working Group which published the report was composed solely of civil servants and people from the banks and sought no input from agencies with decades of experience in this sector such as Threshold, Respond, FocusIreland, Vincent dePaul, as well as the likes of the Free Legal Advice Centre and New Beginning. Many of these agencies form part of the Community and Voluntary Sector (like the Community Platform) where women are more heavily represented than men. Argument that the expertise of people in this sector (mainly women) are not as highly regarded as the expertise of those in the business sector (mainly men) even though many of those in the latter category (through banking, speculation, and property development) helped to create the articifical bubble which has resulted in Ireland experiencing a more severe recession than the majority of European countries.

  1. Confidence (physically and intellectually)

-          Crisis of confidence among women physically

Don’t need to go into in great detail…it is widely-accepted that young girls and women are under huge pressure as a result of the pornification of culture whereby women’s bodies are constantly under scrutiny, they are commodified and used to market everything. Quote Sineád Kennedy (pg. 7): “These unrealistic images of women permeate popular culture, negatively affecting the self-image of women and girls from a very young age. As a result of these airbrushed beauty standards, 85 percent of women feel dissatisfied with their appearance with reports suggesting that the average woman goes on three diets a year and that by the age of 10, almost 80 percent of girls have already tried to diet to lose weight”. How does this relate to women and politics? Because women are doubly judged – a clear illustration of this is an appearance UCD Professor Kathleen Lynch made on Tonight with Vincent Browne a few months back where she was subject to vicious and sexist criticism on Twitter with commentators calling her a “silly bitch”. In an interview after the programme she commented on the abuse saying this is a reason why women don’t put themselves forward in public life, “women will not put themselves forward because they are abused in a different way than men are abused. Men are abused for their ideas but they are not abused in terms of their appearance in the media if they dissent. Women are subjected to sexualised abuse”.

-          Is there a crisis of confidence intellectually?

Unsure about this – girls perform better than boys at school and 57% of all third level graduates are women. But if we look at politics, the media, business etc. it is by and large dominated by white middle-class men. Reluctance on the part of women to step into the limelight even though they have the expertise (linked to above). For example: comments by Sinn Féin Senator Kathryn Reilly at IFN ‘Y Lead?’ event – gut reaction when asked to stand for election was to say no and assume she wasn’t capable even though she had been working as Parliamentary Assistant to the Sinn Féin spokesperson on Finance and was more than able to hold her own.

  1. 4.       Need to be specific!

Need to be specific in our feminism and how this informs our politics – this is more than just a numbers game, Dana in the Áras would do little for the women’s movement, other than set it back a few decades. It’s about getting the right kind of women into parliament – and we need to have quite a broad definition of what constitutes the right kind of woman (eg. may not be completely aligned with my own political beliefs). We need to ask where is the diversity??! To the best of my knowledge, no woman or man from the Traveller community has ever been elected to the Dáil or Seanad, where are disabled women, migrant women, and women whose are second or third generation immigrants – to be clear, I don’t mean to imply that these women are solely defined by their ‘dis’ability or anything like that but there is a lack of diversity within feminism in Ireland (Saghar from the Amnesty Iran group challenged us on our inclusivity at the IFN relaunch)…

What can we as feminists do to engage more women in politics? Do we take an internal approach and push for change from within parties, what can organisation like the IFN do? (Ref draft position paper and dissemination of information)…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s